Tuesday, May 23, 2006

From an alum:

I wish I knew more about Scofield aside from the fact that he wasn't principal there that long. And the lady that came after him and before Dawson. Come to think of it, I wish I knew more about all of them. At least when Joe Wilson came to City, we got to know about his background like where he went to school and where he'd taught. Things you might want to know about the person set to run the school.

Actually, what I'd really like to know is were the students and teachers even involved in bringing Dawson or either of the other two to City? Does the School Improvement Team (SIT) even exist anymore? Or was that stamped out during some action to consolidate power?


Answer: A committee was formed with the SIT team, two teachers, alumni, and a student when Joe Wilson left. However, North Avenue hired the committee fourth choice (Scofield). That led many to believe that Scofield was just a patsy, who North Avenue never intended to be successful. He certainly never got the support that others had. Not that he was that great.

Back to alum: Anyway, I did a web search and found this:

http://www.miaminewtimes.com/Issues/1998-05-21/news/metro.html

Thanks, we'll add it to the links.

... I like the City Forever blog idea. If it really is on the level, then it should be gathering statements from students and teachers whenever crazy incidents take place. Eventually, they should be put into a report and presented to the school system. And if they don't want to make any changes, then they should be reported to the media.

Did you know that City was recently ranked as the #203 best high school in the country in a Washington Post/Newsweek poll of schools? The reporter has email. If the CF blog is on the level and what they wrote earlier today is true, then this is just the sort of news story that might get some attention drawn to all the mess at the school. That and send it to the Abell Foundation. Bob Embry has been an alumnus supporter of City (at least in the past) and he has considerable influence within Baltimore's power structure to get stuff done (assuming he'd be willing to help, that is).


http://www.thewbalchannel.com/education/2853447/detail.html

Back in the day, I think that the Alumni Association used to be able to be used as a resource for grievances. I think they used to give more money to the school. These days, I'm not so sure, either. Maybe one of these days, somebody else (or maybe me) will start a new alumni organization. Who knows? What I do know, though, is that even if the school is good enough to be ranked #203 in the nation, then if the principal wasn't out jacking folks up, it might be even better.

Note: Dawson seems to have the alumni in his back pocket, probably because of his emphasis on sports. However, it is unknown what other strengths, if any, he brings to the school. Discipline has been dismal this year and the building is very dirty. Events are run haphazardly and dissent is high.

I think the school needs an independent board, made up of student leaders, teachers, former teachers and administrators, other educational experts, and alumni (and alumnae) to oversee the running of the school.

Great idea.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

I must say that as an alumnus, I am truly dismayed to hear that City has fallen into such a state. After what I've read here and what I've read in the blog of the student you refer to in your May 8 post, I have quite a few questions and thoughts.

New fancy princpal's office? Why? Why is that a priority while students are walking in late? Maybe he likes well appointed offices. He got one paid for by a sponsor at one of his last jobs.

But still, why is that the priority when the school's website --which is supposed to express what City College is and who we are as a community of teachers, scholars, and alumnae-- is so lacking, especially when compared to those of Western and Poly?

Why aren't there syllabi and course descriptions online? Why isn't there more information being placed on the site to give parents, as well as prospective students and their parents an idea of what's happening (or supposed to be happening) at the school? For goodness' sake, the athletic teams' schedules aren't even online.

Elections for school uniforms fixed? And from what I've heard, the uniforms aren't even mandatory. What kind of system is this?

Teachers having their jobs threatened? What kind of environment is created by bullying teachers and threatening their jobs? Is that the environment conducive to scholarly excellence?

Lack of academic leadership by the principal is inexcusable at City. City is supposed to be, first and foremost, a community of scholars. Everybody who's ever gone to City knows that athletics play an important role in the City experience, but academics should be the first priority. I don't know what the background of the current principal is with respect to his own scholarly pursuits, but City needs a true academic leader.

If there are students who need discipline, then hire an assistant principal to fulfill that role (and I say that as an observer, not as an educational professional, so hopefully I'm not too far off base). But, in all honesty, if there are students who need extreme levels of discipline, they simply don't need to be at City. I'm a liberal guy, but I deeply believe that students who are not mature enough to handle the sort of academic environment that City is supposed to be, do not need to be there.

Really, if there are kids who won't act right because they don't see the principal walking the hall, I have to question what sorts of students are being given the privilege of attending City and why they're there. Mature students don't need the principal or teachers looking over their shoulder to ensure that they're acting right. They simply show up at school everyday to learn, to participate in their activities, and to interact socially at the right times.

I do realize that kids can be kids, but excess fighting, defecating on teachers' property, and the other shenanigans I've heard of City students engaging in recently shouldn't even be welcome at City, at all, regardless of who the principal is.

Losing nine teachers' spots is egregious, especially given that many classes at City call for discussion and debate, which in my opinion, function better when classes don't have fifty students in them.

A dirty building is similarly intolerable. David Gunn, the former president of Amtrak, says that his first priority in running the national rail system was to bring it into a state of good repair. I imagine that in any organizational environment, including schools, a state of good repair, including cleanliness, is also first priority. With respect to City specifically, the kind of environment that City is supposed to be, calls for the school to be clean and in good repair. While the school is an older building, prone to dust, etc., the school needs to be maintained.

What exactly is this situation with the parking? When I was attending the school, students weren't even allowed to park in the same lot off of Alameda and Kirk, that the teachers parked in. If I remember correctly.

If the alumni --specifically the Alumni Association-- are satisfied with Dawson because the athletics are going well, that is sad and pathetic, really.


- anon alum (anoncityalum@gmail.com)

Anonymous said...

This is ridiculous use this energy to make improvements to the school on face. The idea that u waste energy complaining on a blog and not work to make improvements shows that there appears to be an agenda behind this. If you all truly cared for CITY you would be working with the SIT, PTSA, SGA, Dawson to make improvements. But you dont in my opinion so honestly what is your agenda?

Anonymous said...

бесплатный сайт любителей группового секса
порно войны 1
голимая порнуха
13 летние эротика
фотографии секс старух
куба секс
обсуждаем секс большом городе
рамблер порно
www порно ролики
секс знакомства минск